On the crisis "financial" overall we interviewed Professor. Toni Negri.
"This crisis breaks out in the U.S. because at some point the banks are no longer able to pay all the claims that were covered.
This happens because one side has raised the overall cost of the representation of the system, were then added the costs of war that were extremely important in the U.S. doubling the U.S. public debt.
But the thing was absolutely central to the form in which the U.S. government, U.S. policy had implanted the passing of Fordism, namely the Reagan, neocorservatore. "
Interview transcript
Right now, from a global point of view, the crisis that had left the United States and was defined as the financial crisis, has been growing in a kind of domino effect not only in the international markets, but also investing directly our lives. Why 'call this financial crisis as a structural crisis of the system?
Respond and 'quite difficult, I must say. Meanwhile, because we say 'this crisis and' exploded. Explodes in the U.S. because 'at some point the banks fail more' to pay all the claims that were covered. Then, this happens for reasons that are quite clear, on the one hand, because ', with the cost of oil and raw materials, and' increased the overall cost of reproduction system. Here you are then added costs of the war, which were extremely heavy in the United States, where they doubled the national debt.
But it's absolutely crucial and 'was the form in which the U.S. capital, the U.S. government, U.S. policy as a whole, had implanted the passing of Fordism, that' the neo-conservative.
As we all know, liberalization and privatization were extreme, the welfare state was virtually destroyed. E pero 'it was clear that the companies' U.S., being a damned hard down, that' firm in its needs and its needs, not refusing it 'caring for them' to buy the house, it 'families waive send their children to school.
So happens that at some point the capital, the government was forced to reopen the welfare. But reopen in a completely privatized. Instead of socializing the costs of hospitals, schools, etc., to cover directly by the state, has' started to privatize them, that 'to ask people to pay. But since people could do so only partially, but mainly took a loan to get paid, and it 'created an enormous debt that at some point and' jumped. Much more 'who, not content to force people to save and spend the money to survive, bankers in general and the financial world - bada well, not just direct from criminals, but also by professors from major universities', Harvard University, Yale, all winners of the latest Nobel prize for economics - had found ways to distribute, to spread this debt in the General companies', renewing forms, with each other debts and particularly lend themselves to other financial institutions outside the United States.
Now, given that globalization is not 'a dream but a reality', this crisis - which erupted from the bottom in the U.S., where no 'was invented a banking crisis, but' came from and what 'deficit spending that was to enable social peace, and when this deficit and 'skipped, and the crisis' broke out for this - has been growing throughout the world, because' the world 'global, non c'e' SOVEREIGNTY ', ne' sovereign state ne 'national bank that takes. Now there are two roads absolutely clear. On the one hand there is' the transition from a financially and what 'the enterprise level, production in general. It 'a real economic recession that will impose' in a short time po 'everywhere. E 'gia' was widely announced: all the indices of growth for next year are limited to the core countries to zero point, for countries emerging at a figure, the ten percent lo you will see 'very rarely. Therefore stabilizes the recession, that 'the one that stabilizes and' a great destruction of wealth public.
There were very strange interpretations, which came from right-wing men who pretended to criticize. Now go, saying: "Ah, these criminals of bankers have ruined!" And the fact 'that the finance and now' become a productive tool like all others, gia 'Marx widely acknowledged that finance was an essential tool for extending the scope of investment. Inside Globalization, for example, the entire process that has brought huge countries like China and India on the threshold of maturity 'industrial, all the great development of autonomy, out of dependency, and that' since in Latin America, would not be been possible without the mass media, the organization's finances. On the other hand, and 'now difficult to distinguish the productive capital goods from the capital which is organized in finance. Indeed say that 'almost impossible, there' a chance 'to distinguish profit from pension, annuity and financial and' absolutely become hegemonic. There 'no great Italian industrial not sit well in Mediobanca: ie' not them 'to decide the financial fate of the country with all that it follows.
The central problem and 'at this point able to understand how to stop this drift: I believe that all this can be done in one way and' re completely and what 'capacity' populations, people who work , To recapture the income and then reopen circuit life, consumption and liberation on inside this level. But all this could not be 'I do if not through the struggles, because' s clear that the form in which the capital today and says' that the crackdown in consumption more 'simple, consumption of playing at the level to which we are obviously arrived. And 'there that this is why fight' - if the capitalists now want to rebuild their fortunes, as they do? - Must continue to press to compress what are the needs of subsistence and reproduction of the multitudes and this seems very difficult. Here, there is the panacea that is now presented, with great emphasis on advertising the new interventionism of the nation, which even leads to paradox some of the neo-con, among the advocates of neo-liberal system and ideology of absolute freedom market, to become champions of the state in managing the crisis. This is about America, but as the debate is shifting in Europe and obviously also in the Italian province. It 'a crazy paradox that, however, may not quite be the resolution of the crisis, how did you first analyzed.
Here we must be very careful. When you arrive at a debt that is almost ten thousand billion dollars, as in the United States, and when you think that this debt is primarily supported by loans that China and the countries of Asia and the Gulf are the Americans, understand that the problem here is the need 'to extinguish, or at least contain this debt. These are figures that we can not even imagine, are ten or fifteen times the budget of the Italian State, namely the budget of a nation of sixty million people. And we can not even imagine how big countries like China or India or the Gulf countries, which are, individually and taken together, major economic powers, can continue to pay the debt without asking the American counterparts. Counterparts in terms of actual power. That is the problem here is a huge weight because you return again to talk about war, not in terms of "wars of police" in the manner of Bush, but of real wars, destruction of those wars between major economic powers dell'egemonia for global conquest. Yesterday, for example, I and waterfalls on the eye of an absolutely incredible news from credit rating agency (like 'evaluation) Moody's, which is one of those big agencies that serve to ensure other gangs of criminals, ie ensure that 'the trust' budgets, the accounts of companies and nations. Well, in this situation, continue to give the highest qualification, that is three times "A", the United States of America, the state budget of the United States. And why 'say they do it? Why 'the United States remains the greatest military power. E 'capacity' to move war, to exercise command by the military as a last resort guarantee of U.S. economic power.
These are clearly issues that open and give you some 'the vertigo in the face of what is happening. This launch once more 'need absolutely essential that there is a real "New Deal". But, bada well, when I say "New Deal" I refer to that 'this season of reform and recovery after the crisis of 1929 and the Great Depression of the Thirties and' really was: the New Deal was the reopening of the conflict class. Its protagonist, U.S. President Roosevelt, is aware that to beat the capitalists responsible for the crisis, we must call into play the strength worker, the strength of workers, and even helps with the Government to form new unions: the CIO was born then , In 1933, just as support for the company a chance to breathe outside the rhythms imposed by the dominant capitalist. And now this thing has to be repeated on a more level 'general Today we must avoid the dangers of war, because' remember that the great crisis, those we call the "crisis darwniane" system, are crises that often lead war, because 'selfishness is organized in war, selfishness in crisis, frustrated selfishness is organized into war. Here, at this stage, we can save the world, if we are able to revive most of the struggles of that and that 'today the "working class", namely the working class social, one that actually produces in general.
Thank you. One last joke: all that is then presented in the media to say the least superficial, and sometimes even provocative in a way, as if people had not just the brain to understand things ...
It 'just so and the thing that I would very attentive and' the resumption of talks fascists, because 'it is fascism when attacking the great masters of steam, pretending that behind there is a system, a capitalist system, as if makers were the only corrupt. And this' a story that starts from the French Revolution, there were the bad noble, but the nobility was basically a voucher system, and latifundium is basically a just system, but there is the mafia and there ' is everything else, there are bad bankers and then the other hand, are good ...
All these speeches serve two purposes': to eliminate the difference in class and to identify the pure and simple scapegoats.
"This crisis breaks out in the U.S. because at some point the banks are no longer able to pay all the claims that were covered.
This happens because one side has raised the overall cost of the representation of the system, were then added the costs of war that were extremely important in the U.S. doubling the U.S. public debt.
But the thing was absolutely central to the form in which the U.S. government, U.S. policy had implanted the passing of Fordism, namely the Reagan, neocorservatore. "
Interview transcript
Right now, from a global point of view, the crisis that had left the United States and was defined as the financial crisis, has been growing in a kind of domino effect not only in the international markets, but also investing directly our lives. Why 'call this financial crisis as a structural crisis of the system?
Respond and 'quite difficult, I must say. Meanwhile, because we say 'this crisis and' exploded. Explodes in the U.S. because 'at some point the banks fail more' to pay all the claims that were covered. Then, this happens for reasons that are quite clear, on the one hand, because ', with the cost of oil and raw materials, and' increased the overall cost of reproduction system. Here you are then added costs of the war, which were extremely heavy in the United States, where they doubled the national debt.
But it's absolutely crucial and 'was the form in which the U.S. capital, the U.S. government, U.S. policy as a whole, had implanted the passing of Fordism, that' the neo-conservative.
As we all know, liberalization and privatization were extreme, the welfare state was virtually destroyed. E pero 'it was clear that the companies' U.S., being a damned hard down, that' firm in its needs and its needs, not refusing it 'caring for them' to buy the house, it 'families waive send their children to school.
So happens that at some point the capital, the government was forced to reopen the welfare. But reopen in a completely privatized. Instead of socializing the costs of hospitals, schools, etc., to cover directly by the state, has' started to privatize them, that 'to ask people to pay. But since people could do so only partially, but mainly took a loan to get paid, and it 'created an enormous debt that at some point and' jumped. Much more 'who, not content to force people to save and spend the money to survive, bankers in general and the financial world - bada well, not just direct from criminals, but also by professors from major universities', Harvard University, Yale, all winners of the latest Nobel prize for economics - had found ways to distribute, to spread this debt in the General companies', renewing forms, with each other debts and particularly lend themselves to other financial institutions outside the United States.
Now, given that globalization is not 'a dream but a reality', this crisis - which erupted from the bottom in the U.S., where no 'was invented a banking crisis, but' came from and what 'deficit spending that was to enable social peace, and when this deficit and 'skipped, and the crisis' broke out for this - has been growing throughout the world, because' the world 'global, non c'e' SOVEREIGNTY ', ne' sovereign state ne 'national bank that takes. Now there are two roads absolutely clear. On the one hand there is' the transition from a financially and what 'the enterprise level, production in general. It 'a real economic recession that will impose' in a short time po 'everywhere. E 'gia' was widely announced: all the indices of growth for next year are limited to the core countries to zero point, for countries emerging at a figure, the ten percent lo you will see 'very rarely. Therefore stabilizes the recession, that 'the one that stabilizes and' a great destruction of wealth public.
There were very strange interpretations, which came from right-wing men who pretended to criticize. Now go, saying: "Ah, these criminals of bankers have ruined!" And the fact 'that the finance and now' become a productive tool like all others, gia 'Marx widely acknowledged that finance was an essential tool for extending the scope of investment. Inside Globalization, for example, the entire process that has brought huge countries like China and India on the threshold of maturity 'industrial, all the great development of autonomy, out of dependency, and that' since in Latin America, would not be been possible without the mass media, the organization's finances. On the other hand, and 'now difficult to distinguish the productive capital goods from the capital which is organized in finance. Indeed say that 'almost impossible, there' a chance 'to distinguish profit from pension, annuity and financial and' absolutely become hegemonic. There 'no great Italian industrial not sit well in Mediobanca: ie' not them 'to decide the financial fate of the country with all that it follows.
The central problem and 'at this point able to understand how to stop this drift: I believe that all this can be done in one way and' re completely and what 'capacity' populations, people who work , To recapture the income and then reopen circuit life, consumption and liberation on inside this level. But all this could not be 'I do if not through the struggles, because' s clear that the form in which the capital today and says' that the crackdown in consumption more 'simple, consumption of playing at the level to which we are obviously arrived. And 'there that this is why fight' - if the capitalists now want to rebuild their fortunes, as they do? - Must continue to press to compress what are the needs of subsistence and reproduction of the multitudes and this seems very difficult. Here, there is the panacea that is now presented, with great emphasis on advertising the new interventionism of the nation, which even leads to paradox some of the neo-con, among the advocates of neo-liberal system and ideology of absolute freedom market, to become champions of the state in managing the crisis. This is about America, but as the debate is shifting in Europe and obviously also in the Italian province. It 'a crazy paradox that, however, may not quite be the resolution of the crisis, how did you first analyzed.
Here we must be very careful. When you arrive at a debt that is almost ten thousand billion dollars, as in the United States, and when you think that this debt is primarily supported by loans that China and the countries of Asia and the Gulf are the Americans, understand that the problem here is the need 'to extinguish, or at least contain this debt. These are figures that we can not even imagine, are ten or fifteen times the budget of the Italian State, namely the budget of a nation of sixty million people. And we can not even imagine how big countries like China or India or the Gulf countries, which are, individually and taken together, major economic powers, can continue to pay the debt without asking the American counterparts. Counterparts in terms of actual power. That is the problem here is a huge weight because you return again to talk about war, not in terms of "wars of police" in the manner of Bush, but of real wars, destruction of those wars between major economic powers dell'egemonia for global conquest. Yesterday, for example, I and waterfalls on the eye of an absolutely incredible news from credit rating agency (like 'evaluation) Moody's, which is one of those big agencies that serve to ensure other gangs of criminals, ie ensure that 'the trust' budgets, the accounts of companies and nations. Well, in this situation, continue to give the highest qualification, that is three times "A", the United States of America, the state budget of the United States. And why 'say they do it? Why 'the United States remains the greatest military power. E 'capacity' to move war, to exercise command by the military as a last resort guarantee of U.S. economic power.
These are clearly issues that open and give you some 'the vertigo in the face of what is happening. This launch once more 'need absolutely essential that there is a real "New Deal". But, bada well, when I say "New Deal" I refer to that 'this season of reform and recovery after the crisis of 1929 and the Great Depression of the Thirties and' really was: the New Deal was the reopening of the conflict class. Its protagonist, U.S. President Roosevelt, is aware that to beat the capitalists responsible for the crisis, we must call into play the strength worker, the strength of workers, and even helps with the Government to form new unions: the CIO was born then , In 1933, just as support for the company a chance to breathe outside the rhythms imposed by the dominant capitalist. And now this thing has to be repeated on a more level 'general Today we must avoid the dangers of war, because' remember that the great crisis, those we call the "crisis darwniane" system, are crises that often lead war, because 'selfishness is organized in war, selfishness in crisis, frustrated selfishness is organized into war. Here, at this stage, we can save the world, if we are able to revive most of the struggles of that and that 'today the "working class", namely the working class social, one that actually produces in general.
Thank you. One last joke: all that is then presented in the media to say the least superficial, and sometimes even provocative in a way, as if people had not just the brain to understand things ...
It 'just so and the thing that I would very attentive and' the resumption of talks fascists, because 'it is fascism when attacking the great masters of steam, pretending that behind there is a system, a capitalist system, as if makers were the only corrupt. And this' a story that starts from the French Revolution, there were the bad noble, but the nobility was basically a voucher system, and latifundium is basically a just system, but there is the mafia and there ' is everything else, there are bad bankers and then the other hand, are good ...
All these speeches serve two purposes': to eliminate the difference in class and to identify the pure and simple scapegoats.
source: Globalproject
translation: google translate
No comments:
Post a Comment